5.2 KiB
Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
Branch: [###-feature-name] | Date: [DATE] | Spec: [link]
Input: Feature specification from /specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md
Note: This template is filled in by the /speckit.plan command. See .specify/templates/commands/plan.md for the execution workflow.
Summary
[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
Technical Context
Language/Version: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Primary Dependencies: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Storage: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
Testing: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Target Platform: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Project Type: [single/web/mobile - determines source structure]
Performance Goals: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Constraints: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Scale/Scope: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
Constitution Check
GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.
Principle I - Tool-First Architecture
- Feature designed as standalone, reusable tool
- Single responsibility clearly defined
- Independently testable and documented
- Supports both CLI and programmatic use
Principle II - Developer Experience (DX) Priority
- API/interface is clear and intuitive
- Documentation includes examples
- Error messages guide users to solutions
- Simple by default, powerful when needed
Principle III - Hook-Driven Extensibility
- Uses well-defined hooks with clear contracts (if applicable)
- Hook execution is predictable and debuggable
- Hook failures are graceful and informative
Principle IV - Agent Specialization
- Agent has clearly defined scope (if applicable)
- Agent is context-aware with appropriate tools
- Agent prompts are version-controlled and testable
Principle V - Test-First Development (NON-NEGOTIABLE)
- Tests will be written before implementation
- Unit tests cover core functionality
- Integration tests validate tool composition/hook interactions
- Agent behavior validated through prompt/output testing (if applicable)
Principle VI - Observability & Debuggability
- Appropriate logging levels defined (debug, info, warn, error)
- Events emitted for monitoring (if applicable)
- Reasoning/decision-making processes exposed (for agents)
- Performance metrics measurable
Principle VII - Simplicity & YAGNI
- Simplest solution chosen
- Complexity justified (see Complexity Tracking if violations exist)
- Composition preferred over inheritance
- No premature optimization or feature bloat
Project Structure
Documentation (this feature)
specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
Source Code (repository root)
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/
tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── models/
│ ├── services/
│ └── api/
└── tests/
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── pages/
│ └── services/
└── tests/
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]
ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
Structure Decision: [Document the selected structure and reference the real directories captured above]
Complexity Tracking
Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|---|---|---|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |