feat: generate implementation plan and design artifacts
This commit is contained in:
72
.gemini/commands/constitution.toml
Normal file
72
.gemini/commands/constitution.toml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
description = "Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync."
|
||||
|
||||
prompt = """
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
|
||||
# (No scripts section: constitution edits are manual authoring assisted by the agent)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. This file is a TEMPLATE containing placeholder tokens in square brackets (e.g. `[PROJECT_NAME]`, `[PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]`). Your job is to (a) collect/derive concrete values, (b) fill the template precisely, and (c) propagate any amendments across dependent artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
Follow this execution flow:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Load the existing constitution template at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
|
||||
- Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
|
||||
**IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
|
||||
- If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
|
||||
- Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
|
||||
- For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
|
||||
- `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
|
||||
* MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
|
||||
* MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
|
||||
* PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
|
||||
- If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Draft the updated constitution content:
|
||||
- Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
|
||||
- Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
|
||||
- Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing non‑negotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
|
||||
- Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
|
||||
- Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
|
||||
- Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
|
||||
- Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
|
||||
- Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
|
||||
- Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
|
||||
|
||||
5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
|
||||
- Version change: old → new
|
||||
- List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
|
||||
- Added sections
|
||||
- Removed sections
|
||||
- Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
|
||||
- Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
|
||||
|
||||
6. Validation before final output:
|
||||
- No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
|
||||
- Version line matches report.
|
||||
- Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
|
||||
- Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
|
||||
|
||||
7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
|
||||
|
||||
8. Output a final summary to the user with:
|
||||
- New version and bump rationale.
|
||||
- Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
|
||||
- Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
|
||||
|
||||
Formatting & Style Requirements:
|
||||
- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
|
||||
- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
|
||||
- Keep a single blank line between sections.
|
||||
- Avoid trailing whitespace.
|
||||
|
||||
If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
|
||||
|
||||
If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
56
.gemini/commands/implement.toml
Normal file
56
.gemini/commands/implement.toml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
description = "Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md"
|
||||
|
||||
prompt = """
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Given the current feature context, do this:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-implementation-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Load and analyze the implementation context:
|
||||
- **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
|
||||
- **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
|
||||
- **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
|
||||
- **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
|
||||
- **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
|
||||
- **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
3. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
|
||||
- **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
|
||||
- **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
|
||||
- **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
|
||||
- **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
|
||||
|
||||
4. Execute implementation following the task plan:
|
||||
- **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
|
||||
- **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
|
||||
- **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
|
||||
- **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
|
||||
- **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
5. Implementation execution rules:
|
||||
- **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
|
||||
- **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
|
||||
- **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
|
||||
- **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
|
||||
- **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
|
||||
|
||||
6. Progress tracking and error handling:
|
||||
- Report progress after each completed task
|
||||
- Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
|
||||
- For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
|
||||
- Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
|
||||
- Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
|
||||
- **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
|
||||
|
||||
7. Completion validation:
|
||||
- Verify all required tasks are completed
|
||||
- Check that implemented features match the original specification
|
||||
- Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
|
||||
- Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
|
||||
- Report final status with summary of completed work
|
||||
|
||||
Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
40
.gemini/commands/plan.toml
Normal file
40
.gemini/commands/plan.toml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
|
||||
description = "Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts."
|
||||
|
||||
prompt = """
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Given the implementation details provided as an argument, do this:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from the repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. All future file paths must be absolute.
|
||||
2. Read and analyze the feature specification to understand:
|
||||
- The feature requirements and user stories
|
||||
- Functional and non-functional requirements
|
||||
- Success criteria and acceptance criteria
|
||||
- Any technical constraints or dependencies mentioned
|
||||
|
||||
3. Read the constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md` to understand constitutional requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
4. Execute the implementation plan template:
|
||||
- Load `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` (already copied to IMPL_PLAN path)
|
||||
- Set Input path to FEATURE_SPEC
|
||||
- Run the Execution Flow (main) function steps 1-9
|
||||
- The template is self-contained and executable
|
||||
- Follow error handling and gate checks as specified
|
||||
- Let the template guide artifact generation in $SPECS_DIR:
|
||||
* Phase 0 generates research.md
|
||||
* Phase 1 generates data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
|
||||
* Phase 2 generates tasks.md
|
||||
- Incorporate user-provided details from arguments into Technical Context: {{args}}
|
||||
- Update Progress Tracking as you complete each phase
|
||||
|
||||
5. Verify execution completed:
|
||||
- Check Progress Tracking shows all phases complete
|
||||
- Ensure all required artifacts were generated
|
||||
- Confirm no ERROR states in execution
|
||||
|
||||
6. Report results with branch name, file paths, and generated artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
Use absolute paths with the repository root for all file operations to avoid path issues.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
17
.gemini/commands/specify.toml
Normal file
17
.gemini/commands/specify.toml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
description = "Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description."
|
||||
|
||||
prompt = """
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Given the feature description provided as an argument, do this:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run the script `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "{{args}}"` from repo root and parse its JSON output for BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE. All file paths must be absolute.
|
||||
**IMPORTANT** You must only ever run this script once. The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for.
|
||||
2. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
|
||||
3. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
|
||||
4. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, and readiness for the next phase.
|
||||
|
||||
Note: The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
62
.gemini/commands/tasks.toml
Normal file
62
.gemini/commands/tasks.toml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
description = "Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts."
|
||||
|
||||
prompt = """
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Given the context provided as an argument, do this:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-task-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute.
|
||||
2. Load and analyze available design documents:
|
||||
- Always read plan.md for tech stack and libraries
|
||||
- IF EXISTS: Read data-model.md for entities
|
||||
- IF EXISTS: Read contracts/ for API endpoints
|
||||
- IF EXISTS: Read research.md for technical decisions
|
||||
- IF EXISTS: Read quickstart.md for test scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Not all projects have all documents. For example:
|
||||
- CLI tools might not have contracts/
|
||||
- Simple libraries might not need data-model.md
|
||||
- Generate tasks based on what's available
|
||||
|
||||
3. Generate tasks following the template:
|
||||
- Use `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as the base
|
||||
- Replace example tasks with actual tasks based on:
|
||||
* **Setup tasks**: Project init, dependencies, linting
|
||||
* **Test tasks [P]**: One per contract, one per integration scenario
|
||||
* **Core tasks**: One per entity, service, CLI command, endpoint
|
||||
* **Integration tasks**: DB connections, middleware, logging
|
||||
* **Polish tasks [P]**: Unit tests, performance, docs
|
||||
|
||||
4. Task generation rules:
|
||||
- Each contract file → contract test task marked [P]
|
||||
- Each entity in data-model → model creation task marked [P]
|
||||
- Each endpoint → implementation task (not parallel if shared files)
|
||||
- Each user story → integration test marked [P]
|
||||
- Different files = can be parallel [P]
|
||||
- Same file = sequential (no [P])
|
||||
|
||||
5. Order tasks by dependencies:
|
||||
- Setup before everything
|
||||
- Tests before implementation (TDD)
|
||||
- Models before services
|
||||
- Services before endpoints
|
||||
- Core before integration
|
||||
- Everything before polish
|
||||
|
||||
6. Include parallel execution examples:
|
||||
- Group [P] tasks that can run together
|
||||
- Show actual Task agent commands
|
||||
|
||||
7. Create FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md with:
|
||||
- Correct feature name from implementation plan
|
||||
- Numbered tasks (T001, T002, etc.)
|
||||
- Clear file paths for each task
|
||||
- Dependency notes
|
||||
- Parallel execution guidance
|
||||
|
||||
Context for task generation: {{args}}
|
||||
|
||||
The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user