Initial commit from Specify template

This commit is contained in:
2025-09-19 01:06:11 +08:00
commit 01a8fa90e8
26 changed files with 7986 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# [PROJECT_NAME] Constitution
<!-- Example: Spec Constitution, TaskFlow Constitution, etc. -->
## Core Principles
### [PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]
<!-- Example: I. Library-First -->
[PRINCIPLE_1_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Every feature starts as a standalone library; Libraries must be self-contained, independently testable, documented; Clear purpose required - no organizational-only libraries -->
### [PRINCIPLE_2_NAME]
<!-- Example: II. CLI Interface -->
[PRINCIPLE_2_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Every library exposes functionality via CLI; Text in/out protocol: stdin/args → stdout, errors → stderr; Support JSON + human-readable formats -->
### [PRINCIPLE_3_NAME]
<!-- Example: III. Test-First (NON-NEGOTIABLE) -->
[PRINCIPLE_3_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: TDD mandatory: Tests written → User approved → Tests fail → Then implement; Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly enforced -->
### [PRINCIPLE_4_NAME]
<!-- Example: IV. Integration Testing -->
[PRINCIPLE_4_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Focus areas requiring integration tests: New library contract tests, Contract changes, Inter-service communication, Shared schemas -->
### [PRINCIPLE_5_NAME]
<!-- Example: V. Observability, VI. Versioning & Breaking Changes, VII. Simplicity -->
[PRINCIPLE_5_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Text I/O ensures debuggability; Structured logging required; Or: MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD format; Or: Start simple, YAGNI principles -->
## [SECTION_2_NAME]
<!-- Example: Additional Constraints, Security Requirements, Performance Standards, etc. -->
[SECTION_2_CONTENT]
<!-- Example: Technology stack requirements, compliance standards, deployment policies, etc. -->
## [SECTION_3_NAME]
<!-- Example: Development Workflow, Review Process, Quality Gates, etc. -->
[SECTION_3_CONTENT]
<!-- Example: Code review requirements, testing gates, deployment approval process, etc. -->
## Governance
<!-- Example: Constitution supersedes all other practices; Amendments require documentation, approval, migration plan -->
[GOVERNANCE_RULES]
<!-- Example: All PRs/reviews must verify compliance; Complexity must be justified; Use [GUIDANCE_FILE] for runtime development guidance -->
**Version**: [CONSTITUTION_VERSION] | **Ratified**: [RATIFICATION_DATE] | **Last Amended**: [LAST_AMENDED_DATE]
<!-- Example: Version: 2.1.1 | Ratified: 2025-06-13 | Last Amended: 2025-07-16 -->

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
# Constitution Update Checklist
When amending the constitution (`/memory/constitution.md`), ensure all dependent documents are updated to maintain consistency.
## Templates to Update
### When adding/modifying ANY article:
- [ ] `/templates/plan-template.md` - Update Constitution Check section
- [ ] `/templates/spec-template.md` - Update if requirements/scope affected
- [ ] `/templates/tasks-template.md` - Update if new task types needed
- [ ] `/.claude/commands/plan.md` - Update if planning process changes
- [ ] `/.claude/commands/tasks.md` - Update if task generation affected
- [ ] `/CLAUDE.md` - Update runtime development guidelines
### Article-specific updates:
#### Article I (Library-First):
- [ ] Ensure templates emphasize library creation
- [ ] Update CLI command examples
- [ ] Add llms.txt documentation requirements
#### Article II (CLI Interface):
- [ ] Update CLI flag requirements in templates
- [ ] Add text I/O protocol reminders
#### Article III (Test-First):
- [ ] Update test order in all templates
- [ ] Emphasize TDD requirements
- [ ] Add test approval gates
#### Article IV (Integration Testing):
- [ ] List integration test triggers
- [ ] Update test type priorities
- [ ] Add real dependency requirements
#### Article V (Observability):
- [ ] Add logging requirements to templates
- [ ] Include multi-tier log streaming
- [ ] Update performance monitoring sections
#### Article VI (Versioning):
- [ ] Add version increment reminders
- [ ] Include breaking change procedures
- [ ] Update migration requirements
#### Article VII (Simplicity):
- [ ] Update project count limits
- [ ] Add pattern prohibition examples
- [ ] Include YAGNI reminders
## Validation Steps
1. **Before committing constitution changes:**
- [ ] All templates reference new requirements
- [ ] Examples updated to match new rules
- [ ] No contradictions between documents
2. **After updating templates:**
- [ ] Run through a sample implementation plan
- [ ] Verify all constitution requirements addressed
- [ ] Check that templates are self-contained (readable without constitution)
3. **Version tracking:**
- [ ] Update constitution version number
- [ ] Note version in template footers
- [ ] Add amendment to constitution history
## Common Misses
Watch for these often-forgotten updates:
- Command documentation (`/commands/*.md`)
- Checklist items in templates
- Example code/commands
- Domain-specific variations (web vs mobile vs CLI)
- Cross-references between documents
## Template Sync Status
Last sync check: 2025-07-16
- Constitution version: 2.1.1
- Templates aligned: ❌ (missing versioning, observability details)
---
*This checklist ensures the constitution's principles are consistently applied across all project documentation.*

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
JSON_MODE=false
for arg in "$@"; do case "$arg" in --json) JSON_MODE=true ;; --help|-h) echo "Usage: $0 [--json]"; exit 0 ;; esac; done
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
eval $(get_feature_paths)
check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" || exit 1
if [[ ! -d "$FEATURE_DIR" ]]; then echo "ERROR: Feature directory not found: $FEATURE_DIR"; echo "Run /specify first."; exit 1; fi
if [[ ! -f "$IMPL_PLAN" ]]; then echo "ERROR: plan.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR"; echo "Run /plan first."; exit 1; fi
if $JSON_MODE; then
docs=(); [[ -f "$RESEARCH" ]] && docs+=("research.md"); [[ -f "$DATA_MODEL" ]] && docs+=("data-model.md"); ([[ -d "$CONTRACTS_DIR" ]] && [[ -n "$(ls -A "$CONTRACTS_DIR" 2>/dev/null)" ]]) && docs+=("contracts/"); [[ -f "$QUICKSTART" ]] && docs+=("quickstart.md");
json_docs=$(printf '"%s",' "${docs[@]}"); json_docs="[${json_docs%,}]"; printf '{"FEATURE_DIR":"%s","AVAILABLE_DOCS":%s}\n' "$FEATURE_DIR" "$json_docs"
else
echo "FEATURE_DIR:$FEATURE_DIR"; echo "AVAILABLE_DOCS:"; check_file "$RESEARCH" "research.md"; check_file "$DATA_MODEL" "data-model.md"; check_dir "$CONTRACTS_DIR" "contracts/"; check_file "$QUICKSTART" "quickstart.md"; fi

37
.specify/scripts/bash/common.sh Executable file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# (Moved to scripts/bash/) Common functions and variables for all scripts
get_repo_root() { git rev-parse --show-toplevel; }
get_current_branch() { git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD; }
check_feature_branch() {
local branch="$1"
if [[ ! "$branch" =~ ^[0-9]{3}- ]]; then
echo "ERROR: Not on a feature branch. Current branch: $branch" >&2
echo "Feature branches should be named like: 001-feature-name" >&2
return 1
fi; return 0
}
get_feature_dir() { echo "$1/specs/$2"; }
get_feature_paths() {
local repo_root=$(get_repo_root)
local current_branch=$(get_current_branch)
local feature_dir=$(get_feature_dir "$repo_root" "$current_branch")
cat <<EOF
REPO_ROOT='$repo_root'
CURRENT_BRANCH='$current_branch'
FEATURE_DIR='$feature_dir'
FEATURE_SPEC='$feature_dir/spec.md'
IMPL_PLAN='$feature_dir/plan.md'
TASKS='$feature_dir/tasks.md'
RESEARCH='$feature_dir/research.md'
DATA_MODEL='$feature_dir/data-model.md'
QUICKSTART='$feature_dir/quickstart.md'
CONTRACTS_DIR='$feature_dir/contracts'
EOF
}
check_file() { [[ -f "$1" ]] && echo "$2" || echo "$2"; }
check_dir() { [[ -d "$1" && -n $(ls -A "$1" 2>/dev/null) ]] && echo "$2" || echo "$2"; }

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# (Moved to scripts/bash/) Create a new feature with branch, directory structure, and template
set -e
JSON_MODE=false
ARGS=()
for arg in "$@"; do
case "$arg" in
--json) JSON_MODE=true ;;
--help|-h) echo "Usage: $0 [--json] <feature_description>"; exit 0 ;;
*) ARGS+=("$arg") ;;
esac
done
FEATURE_DESCRIPTION="${ARGS[*]}"
if [ -z "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION" ]; then
echo "Usage: $0 [--json] <feature_description>" >&2
exit 1
fi
REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
SPECS_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/specs"
mkdir -p "$SPECS_DIR"
HIGHEST=0
if [ -d "$SPECS_DIR" ]; then
for dir in "$SPECS_DIR"/*; do
[ -d "$dir" ] || continue
dirname=$(basename "$dir")
number=$(echo "$dirname" | grep -o '^[0-9]\+' || echo "0")
number=$((10#$number))
if [ "$number" -gt "$HIGHEST" ]; then HIGHEST=$number; fi
done
fi
NEXT=$((HIGHEST + 1))
FEATURE_NUM=$(printf "%03d" "$NEXT")
BRANCH_NAME=$(echo "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/[^a-z0-9]/-/g' | sed 's/-\+/-/g' | sed 's/^-//' | sed 's/-$//')
WORDS=$(echo "$BRANCH_NAME" | tr '-' '\n' | grep -v '^$' | head -3 | tr '\n' '-' | sed 's/-$//')
BRANCH_NAME="${FEATURE_NUM}-${WORDS}"
git checkout -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
FEATURE_DIR="$SPECS_DIR/$BRANCH_NAME"
mkdir -p "$FEATURE_DIR"
TEMPLATE="$REPO_ROOT/templates/spec-template.md"
SPEC_FILE="$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md"
if [ -f "$TEMPLATE" ]; then cp "$TEMPLATE" "$SPEC_FILE"; else touch "$SPEC_FILE"; fi
if $JSON_MODE; then
printf '{"BRANCH_NAME":"%s","SPEC_FILE":"%s","FEATURE_NUM":"%s"}\n' "$BRANCH_NAME" "$SPEC_FILE" "$FEATURE_NUM"
else
echo "BRANCH_NAME: $BRANCH_NAME"
echo "SPEC_FILE: $SPEC_FILE"
echo "FEATURE_NUM: $FEATURE_NUM"
fi

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
eval $(get_feature_paths)
check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" || exit 1
echo "REPO_ROOT: $REPO_ROOT"; echo "BRANCH: $CURRENT_BRANCH"; echo "FEATURE_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"; echo "FEATURE_SPEC: $FEATURE_SPEC"; echo "IMPL_PLAN: $IMPL_PLAN"; echo "TASKS: $TASKS"

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
JSON_MODE=false
for arg in "$@"; do case "$arg" in --json) JSON_MODE=true ;; --help|-h) echo "Usage: $0 [--json]"; exit 0 ;; esac; done
SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
eval $(get_feature_paths)
check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" || exit 1
mkdir -p "$FEATURE_DIR"
TEMPLATE="$REPO_ROOT/.specify/templates/plan-template.md"
[[ -f "$TEMPLATE" ]] && cp "$TEMPLATE" "$IMPL_PLAN"
if $JSON_MODE; then
printf '{"FEATURE_SPEC":"%s","IMPL_PLAN":"%s","SPECS_DIR":"%s","BRANCH":"%s"}\n' \
"$FEATURE_SPEC" "$IMPL_PLAN" "$FEATURE_DIR" "$CURRENT_BRANCH"
else
echo "FEATURE_SPEC: $FEATURE_SPEC"; echo "IMPL_PLAN: $IMPL_PLAN"; echo "SPECS_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"; echo "BRANCH: $CURRENT_BRANCH"
fi

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
CURRENT_BRANCH=$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)
FEATURE_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/specs/$CURRENT_BRANCH"
NEW_PLAN="$FEATURE_DIR/plan.md"
CLAUDE_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/CLAUDE.md"; GEMINI_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/GEMINI.md"; COPILOT_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.github/copilot-instructions.md"; CURSOR_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc"; QWEN_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/QWEN.md"; AGENTS_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/AGENTS.md"
AGENT_TYPE="$1"
[ -f "$NEW_PLAN" ] || { echo "ERROR: No plan.md found at $NEW_PLAN"; exit 1; }
echo "=== Updating agent context files for feature $CURRENT_BRANCH ==="
NEW_LANG=$(grep "^**Language/Version**: " "$NEW_PLAN" 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's/^**Language\/Version**: //' | grep -v "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" || echo "")
NEW_FRAMEWORK=$(grep "^**Primary Dependencies**: " "$NEW_PLAN" 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's/^**Primary Dependencies**: //' | grep -v "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" || echo "")
NEW_DB=$(grep "^**Storage**: " "$NEW_PLAN" 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's/^**Storage**: //' | grep -v "N/A" | grep -v "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" || echo "")
NEW_PROJECT_TYPE=$(grep "^**Project Type**: " "$NEW_PLAN" 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's/^**Project Type**: //' || echo "")
update_agent_file() { local target_file="$1" agent_name="$2"; echo "Updating $agent_name context file: $target_file"; local temp_file=$(mktemp); if [ ! -f "$target_file" ]; then
echo "Creating new $agent_name context file..."; if [ -f "$REPO_ROOT/.specify/templates/agent-file-template.md" ]; then cp "$REPO_ROOT/.specify/templates/agent-file-template.md" "$temp_file"; else echo "ERROR: Template not found"; return 1; fi;
sed -i.bak "s/\[PROJECT NAME\]/$(basename $REPO_ROOT)/" "$temp_file"; sed -i.bak "s/\[DATE\]/$(date +%Y-%m-%d)/" "$temp_file"; sed -i.bak "s/\[EXTRACTED FROM ALL PLAN.MD FILES\]/- $NEW_LANG + $NEW_FRAMEWORK ($CURRENT_BRANCH)/" "$temp_file";
if [[ "$NEW_PROJECT_TYPE" == *"web"* ]]; then sed -i.bak "s|\[ACTUAL STRUCTURE FROM PLANS\]|backend/\nfrontend/\ntests/|" "$temp_file"; else sed -i.bak "s|\[ACTUAL STRUCTURE FROM PLANS\]|src/\ntests/|" "$temp_file"; fi;
if [[ "$NEW_LANG" == *"Python"* ]]; then COMMANDS="cd src && pytest && ruff check ."; elif [[ "$NEW_LANG" == *"Rust"* ]]; then COMMANDS="cargo test && cargo clippy"; elif [[ "$NEW_LANG" == *"JavaScript"* ]] || [[ "$NEW_LANG" == *"TypeScript"* ]]; then COMMANDS="npm test && npm run lint"; else COMMANDS="# Add commands for $NEW_LANG"; fi; sed -i.bak "s|\[ONLY COMMANDS FOR ACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES\]|$COMMANDS|" "$temp_file";
sed -i.bak "s|\[LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC, ONLY FOR LANGUAGES IN USE\]|$NEW_LANG: Follow standard conventions|" "$temp_file"; sed -i.bak "s|\[LAST 3 FEATURES AND WHAT THEY ADDED\]|- $CURRENT_BRANCH: Added $NEW_LANG + $NEW_FRAMEWORK|" "$temp_file"; rm "$temp_file.bak";
else
echo "Updating existing $agent_name context file..."; manual_start=$(grep -n "<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS START -->" "$target_file" | cut -d: -f1); manual_end=$(grep -n "<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS END -->" "$target_file" | cut -d: -f1); if [ -n "$manual_start" ] && [ -n "$manual_end" ]; then sed -n "${manual_start},${manual_end}p" "$target_file" > /tmp/manual_additions.txt; fi;
python3 - "$target_file" <<'EOF'
import re,sys,datetime
target=sys.argv[1]
with open(target) as f: content=f.read()
NEW_LANG="'$NEW_LANG'";NEW_FRAMEWORK="'$NEW_FRAMEWORK'";CURRENT_BRANCH="'$CURRENT_BRANCH'";NEW_DB="'$NEW_DB'";NEW_PROJECT_TYPE="'$NEW_PROJECT_TYPE'"
# Tech section
m=re.search(r'## Active Technologies\n(.*?)\n\n',content, re.DOTALL)
if m:
existing=m.group(1)
additions=[]
if '$NEW_LANG' and '$NEW_LANG' not in existing: additions.append(f"- $NEW_LANG + $NEW_FRAMEWORK ($CURRENT_BRANCH)")
if '$NEW_DB' and '$NEW_DB' not in existing and '$NEW_DB'!='N/A': additions.append(f"- $NEW_DB ($CURRENT_BRANCH)")
if additions:
new_block=existing+"\n"+"\n".join(additions)
content=content.replace(m.group(0),f"## Active Technologies\n{new_block}\n\n")
# Recent changes
m2=re.search(r'## Recent Changes\n(.*?)(\n\n|$)',content, re.DOTALL)
if m2:
lines=[l for l in m2.group(1).strip().split('\n') if l]
lines.insert(0,f"- $CURRENT_BRANCH: Added $NEW_LANG + $NEW_FRAMEWORK")
lines=lines[:3]
content=re.sub(r'## Recent Changes\n.*?(\n\n|$)', '## Recent Changes\n'+"\n".join(lines)+'\n\n', content, flags=re.DOTALL)
content=re.sub(r'Last updated: \d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}', 'Last updated: '+datetime.datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d'), content)
open(target+'.tmp','w').write(content)
EOF
mv "$target_file.tmp" "$target_file"; if [ -f /tmp/manual_additions.txt ]; then sed -i.bak '/<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS START -->/,/<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS END -->/d' "$target_file"; cat /tmp/manual_additions.txt >> "$target_file"; rm /tmp/manual_additions.txt "$target_file.bak"; fi;
fi; mv "$temp_file" "$target_file" 2>/dev/null || true; echo "$agent_name context file updated successfully"; }
case "$AGENT_TYPE" in
claude) update_agent_file "$CLAUDE_FILE" "Claude Code" ;;
gemini) update_agent_file "$GEMINI_FILE" "Gemini CLI" ;;
copilot) update_agent_file "$COPILOT_FILE" "GitHub Copilot" ;;
cursor) update_agent_file "$CURSOR_FILE" "Cursor IDE" ;;
qwen) update_agent_file "$QWEN_FILE" "Qwen Code" ;;
opencode) update_agent_file "$AGENTS_FILE" "opencode" ;;
"") [ -f "$CLAUDE_FILE" ] && update_agent_file "$CLAUDE_FILE" "Claude Code"; \
[ -f "$GEMINI_FILE" ] && update_agent_file "$GEMINI_FILE" "Gemini CLI"; \
[ -f "$COPILOT_FILE" ] && update_agent_file "$COPILOT_FILE" "GitHub Copilot"; \
[ -f "$CURSOR_FILE" ] && update_agent_file "$CURSOR_FILE" "Cursor IDE"; \
[ -f "$QWEN_FILE" ] && update_agent_file "$QWEN_FILE" "Qwen Code"; \
[ -f "$AGENTS_FILE" ] && update_agent_file "$AGENTS_FILE" "opencode"; \
if [ ! -f "$CLAUDE_FILE" ] && [ ! -f "$GEMINI_FILE" ] && [ ! -f "$COPILOT_FILE" ] && [ ! -f "$CURSOR_FILE" ] && [ ! -f "$QWEN_FILE" ] && [ ! -f "$AGENTS_FILE" ]; then update_agent_file "$CLAUDE_FILE" "Claude Code"; fi ;;
*) echo "ERROR: Unknown agent type '$AGENT_TYPE' (expected claude|gemini|copilot|cursor|qwen|opencode)"; exit 1 ;;
esac
echo; echo "Summary of changes:"; [ -n "$NEW_LANG" ] && echo "- Added language: $NEW_LANG"; [ -n "$NEW_FRAMEWORK" ] && echo "- Added framework: $NEW_FRAMEWORK"; [ -n "$NEW_DB" ] && [ "$NEW_DB" != "N/A" ] && echo "- Added database: $NEW_DB"; echo; echo "Usage: $0 [claude|gemini|copilot|cursor|qwen|opencode]"

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# [PROJECT NAME] Development Guidelines
Auto-generated from all feature plans. Last updated: [DATE]
## Active Technologies
[EXTRACTED FROM ALL PLAN.MD FILES]
## Project Structure
```
[ACTUAL STRUCTURE FROM PLANS]
```
## Commands
[ONLY COMMANDS FOR ACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES]
## Code Style
[LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC, ONLY FOR LANGUAGES IN USE]
## Recent Changes
[LAST 3 FEATURES AND WHAT THEY ADDED]
<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS START -->
<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS END -->

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
## Execution Flow (/plan command scope)
```
1. Load feature spec from Input path
→ If not found: ERROR "No feature spec at {path}"
2. Fill Technical Context (scan for NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
→ Detect Project Type from context (web=frontend+backend, mobile=app+api)
→ Set Structure Decision based on project type
3. Fill the Constitution Check section based on the content of the constitution document.
4. Evaluate Constitution Check section below
→ If violations exist: Document in Complexity Tracking
→ If no justification possible: ERROR "Simplify approach first"
→ Update Progress Tracking: Initial Constitution Check
5. Execute Phase 0 → research.md
→ If NEEDS CLARIFICATION remain: ERROR "Resolve unknowns"
6. Execute Phase 1 → contracts, data-model.md, quickstart.md, agent-specific template file (e.g., `CLAUDE.md` for Claude Code, `.github/copilot-instructions.md` for GitHub Copilot, `GEMINI.md` for Gemini CLI, `QWEN.md` for Qwen Code or `AGENTS.md` for opencode).
7. Re-evaluate Constitution Check section
→ If new violations: Refactor design, return to Phase 1
→ Update Progress Tracking: Post-Design Constitution Check
8. Plan Phase 2 → Describe task generation approach (DO NOT create tasks.md)
9. STOP - Ready for /tasks command
```
**IMPORTANT**: The /plan command STOPS at step 7. Phases 2-4 are executed by other commands:
- Phase 2: /tasks command creates tasks.md
- Phase 3-4: Implementation execution (manual or via tools)
## Summary
[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
## Technical Context
**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Project Type**: [single/web/mobile - determines source structure]
**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
## Constitution Check
*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
[Gates determined based on constitution file]
## Project Structure
### Documentation (this feature)
```
specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md # This file (/plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/tasks command - NOT created by /plan)
```
### Source Code (repository root)
```
# Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/
tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/
# Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── models/
│ ├── services/
│ └── api/
└── tests/
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── pages/
│ └── services/
└── tests/
# Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]
ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure]
```
**Structure Decision**: [DEFAULT to Option 1 unless Technical Context indicates web/mobile app]
## Phase 0: Outline & Research
1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
- For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION research task
- For each dependency best practices task
- For each integration patterns task
2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
```
For each unknown in Technical Context:
Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
For each technology choice:
Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
```
3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
- Decision: [what was chosen]
- Rationale: [why chosen]
- Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
## Phase 1: Design & Contracts
*Prerequisites: research.md complete*
1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
- Entity name, fields, relationships
- Validation rules from requirements
- State transitions if applicable
2. **Generate API contracts** from functional requirements:
- For each user action → endpoint
- Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns
- Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/`
3. **Generate contract tests** from contracts:
- One test file per endpoint
- Assert request/response schemas
- Tests must fail (no implementation yet)
4. **Extract test scenarios** from user stories:
- Each story → integration test scenario
- Quickstart test = story validation steps
5. **Update agent file incrementally** (O(1) operation):
- Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh claude` for your AI assistant
- If exists: Add only NEW tech from current plan
- Preserve manual additions between markers
- Update recent changes (keep last 3)
- Keep under 150 lines for token efficiency
- Output to repository root
**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, failing tests, quickstart.md, agent-specific file
## Phase 2: Task Planning Approach
*This section describes what the /tasks command will do - DO NOT execute during /plan*
**Task Generation Strategy**:
- Load `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as base
- Generate tasks from Phase 1 design docs (contracts, data model, quickstart)
- Each contract → contract test task [P]
- Each entity → model creation task [P]
- Each user story → integration test task
- Implementation tasks to make tests pass
**Ordering Strategy**:
- TDD order: Tests before implementation
- Dependency order: Models before services before UI
- Mark [P] for parallel execution (independent files)
**Estimated Output**: 25-30 numbered, ordered tasks in tasks.md
**IMPORTANT**: This phase is executed by the /tasks command, NOT by /plan
## Phase 3+: Future Implementation
*These phases are beyond the scope of the /plan command*
**Phase 3**: Task execution (/tasks command creates tasks.md)
**Phase 4**: Implementation (execute tasks.md following constitutional principles)
**Phase 5**: Validation (run tests, execute quickstart.md, performance validation)
## Complexity Tracking
*Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified*
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |
## Progress Tracking
*This checklist is updated during execution flow*
**Phase Status**:
- [ ] Phase 0: Research complete (/plan command)
- [ ] Phase 1: Design complete (/plan command)
- [ ] Phase 2: Task planning complete (/plan command - describe approach only)
- [ ] Phase 3: Tasks generated (/tasks command)
- [ ] Phase 4: Implementation complete
- [ ] Phase 5: Validation passed
**Gate Status**:
- [ ] Initial Constitution Check: PASS
- [ ] Post-Design Constitution Check: PASS
- [ ] All NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
- [ ] Complexity deviations documented
---
*Based on Constitution v2.1.1 - See `/memory/constitution.md`*

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
**Created**: [DATE]
**Status**: Draft
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
## Execution Flow (main)
```
1. Parse user description from Input
→ If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
2. Extract key concepts from description
→ Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
3. For each unclear aspect:
→ Mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question]
4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
→ If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
5. Generate Functional Requirements
→ Each requirement must be testable
→ Mark ambiguous requirements
6. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
7. Run Review Checklist
→ If any [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]: WARN "Spec has uncertainties"
→ If implementation details found: ERROR "Remove tech details"
8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
```
---
## ⚡ Quick Guidelines
- ✅ Focus on WHAT users need and WHY
- ❌ Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure)
- 👥 Written for business stakeholders, not developers
### Section Requirements
- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
### For AI Generation
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
1. **Mark all ambiguities**: Use [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] for any assumption you'd need to make
2. **Don't guess**: If the prompt doesn't specify something (e.g., "login system" without auth method), mark it
3. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
4. **Common underspecified areas**:
- User types and permissions
- Data retention/deletion policies
- Performance targets and scale
- Error handling behaviors
- Integration requirements
- Security/compliance needs
---
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
### Primary User Story
[Describe the main user journey in plain language]
### Acceptance Scenarios
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
### Edge Cases
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
### Functional Requirements
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
---
## Review & Acceptance Checklist
*GATE: Automated checks run during main() execution*
### Content Quality
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [ ] All mandatory sections completed
### Requirement Completeness
- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
- [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
- [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
---
## Execution Status
*Updated by main() during processing*
- [ ] User description parsed
- [ ] Key concepts extracted
- [ ] Ambiguities marked
- [ ] User scenarios defined
- [ ] Requirements generated
- [ ] Entities identified
- [ ] Review checklist passed
---

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
# Tasks: [FEATURE NAME]
**Input**: Design documents from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/`
**Prerequisites**: plan.md (required), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
## Execution Flow (main)
```
1. Load plan.md from feature directory
→ If not found: ERROR "No implementation plan found"
→ Extract: tech stack, libraries, structure
2. Load optional design documents:
→ data-model.md: Extract entities → model tasks
→ contracts/: Each file → contract test task
→ research.md: Extract decisions → setup tasks
3. Generate tasks by category:
→ Setup: project init, dependencies, linting
→ Tests: contract tests, integration tests
→ Core: models, services, CLI commands
→ Integration: DB, middleware, logging
→ Polish: unit tests, performance, docs
4. Apply task rules:
→ Different files = mark [P] for parallel
→ Same file = sequential (no [P])
→ Tests before implementation (TDD)
5. Number tasks sequentially (T001, T002...)
6. Generate dependency graph
7. Create parallel execution examples
8. Validate task completeness:
→ All contracts have tests?
→ All entities have models?
→ All endpoints implemented?
9. Return: SUCCESS (tasks ready for execution)
```
## Format: `[ID] [P?] Description`
- **[P]**: Can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)
- Include exact file paths in descriptions
## Path Conventions
- **Single project**: `src/`, `tests/` at repository root
- **Web app**: `backend/src/`, `frontend/src/`
- **Mobile**: `api/src/`, `ios/src/` or `android/src/`
- Paths shown below assume single project - adjust based on plan.md structure
## Phase 3.1: Setup
- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan
- [ ] T002 Initialize [language] project with [framework] dependencies
- [ ] T003 [P] Configure linting and formatting tools
## Phase 3.2: Tests First (TDD) ⚠️ MUST COMPLETE BEFORE 3.3
**CRITICAL: These tests MUST be written and MUST FAIL before ANY implementation**
- [ ] T004 [P] Contract test POST /api/users in tests/contract/test_users_post.py
- [ ] T005 [P] Contract test GET /api/users/{id} in tests/contract/test_users_get.py
- [ ] T006 [P] Integration test user registration in tests/integration/test_registration.py
- [ ] T007 [P] Integration test auth flow in tests/integration/test_auth.py
## Phase 3.3: Core Implementation (ONLY after tests are failing)
- [ ] T008 [P] User model in src/models/user.py
- [ ] T009 [P] UserService CRUD in src/services/user_service.py
- [ ] T010 [P] CLI --create-user in src/cli/user_commands.py
- [ ] T011 POST /api/users endpoint
- [ ] T012 GET /api/users/{id} endpoint
- [ ] T013 Input validation
- [ ] T014 Error handling and logging
## Phase 3.4: Integration
- [ ] T015 Connect UserService to DB
- [ ] T016 Auth middleware
- [ ] T017 Request/response logging
- [ ] T018 CORS and security headers
## Phase 3.5: Polish
- [ ] T019 [P] Unit tests for validation in tests/unit/test_validation.py
- [ ] T020 Performance tests (<200ms)
- [ ] T021 [P] Update docs/api.md
- [ ] T022 Remove duplication
- [ ] T023 Run manual-testing.md
## Dependencies
- Tests (T004-T007) before implementation (T008-T014)
- T008 blocks T009, T015
- T016 blocks T018
- Implementation before polish (T019-T023)
## Parallel Example
```
# Launch T004-T007 together:
Task: "Contract test POST /api/users in tests/contract/test_users_post.py"
Task: "Contract test GET /api/users/{id} in tests/contract/test_users_get.py"
Task: "Integration test registration in tests/integration/test_registration.py"
Task: "Integration test auth in tests/integration/test_auth.py"
```
## Notes
- [P] tasks = different files, no dependencies
- Verify tests fail before implementing
- Commit after each task
- Avoid: vague tasks, same file conflicts
## Task Generation Rules
*Applied during main() execution*
1. **From Contracts**:
- Each contract file contract test task [P]
- Each endpoint implementation task
2. **From Data Model**:
- Each entity model creation task [P]
- Relationships service layer tasks
3. **From User Stories**:
- Each story integration test [P]
- Quickstart scenarios validation tasks
4. **Ordering**:
- Setup Tests Models Services Endpoints Polish
- Dependencies block parallel execution
## Validation Checklist
*GATE: Checked by main() before returning*
- [ ] All contracts have corresponding tests
- [ ] All entities have model tasks
- [ ] All tests come before implementation
- [ ] Parallel tasks truly independent
- [ ] Each task specifies exact file path
- [ ] No task modifies same file as another [P] task